PJZOCC624;292484 wrote: Spare me the "we are all adults..." yadda yadda crap.
Ever seen someone roll through tech with brake pads worn to the metal?
Ever seen someone roll through tech with cords showing on their tires?
Ever seen someone roll through tech with an oil filter leaking because the rider didn't torque it tight?
Ever seen someone roll through tech with pinched brake lines?
Because there are some STUPID f'ing people out there that need to be protected from THEMSELVES because they think "Hey! I'm an adult! If I fall and hurt myself, it's on ME! Ain't nobody gonna tell me how to ride!" - problem with that is they usually end up hurting someone else. So the rest of us need to be protected from the stupid out there.
So, yeah, if someone rolled through tech with a helmet that's got gashes or scratches, letter or no letter, chances are the dick on the power trip, in the interest of SAFETY, may fail the helmet at tech.
A lot of assumption here.
if there are problems with bike prep, it is a hazard to other riders on the track and as such is dangerous and needs to be censored. And yes, this includes safety wiring a go-pro camera.
However, the OP is acknowledging a crash with damage to the helmet. he then decides to pursue a scientific evaluation by the makers of the helmet and upon being certified safe, is looking to use it ( and furnish a paper to the effect , proving that it was tested) . If anything, this helmet has been scrutinized in excess of the common QC for the assembly produced helmet. Personally, I don't see a reason for him not to use it and for tech to doubt his intentions .. His intentions are clear . He doesn't want to use a substandard helmet on the track.
By accusing that the helmet has since had another crash after the letter from the manufacturer is plain cynical. It is not a fair judgement of his character, in my book. Besides, wearing a damaged helmet jeopardizes the rider and not anyone else, unlike a poorly prepped bike. How often do we see ripped off leathers / gloves with duct tape that passes tech. Dual standards? No one seems to mind that the seams are blown etc. (it is a monumental task for CRs and the rider safety should essentially fall on individuals )
My personal preference is a new helmet but not everyone can afford a quality helmet. I do have to side with TLRSkunk here. I hope the rule gets reviewed. Dogma, after all, is the sacrifice of wisdom to consistency.
just my 2c.
carry on.