rk97
Member
I'm surely in the minority, but I think this is worth addressing.
My first trackday was with NESBA, and I had a blast - but my street riding skills were NOT as good as I had thought they were. to be blunt, I was probably putting other riders at risk my first time out. I hope I'm being constructive by admitting that... i certainly try to remember that every morning in B group going forward.
So if I have any 'feedback,' it would be to continue identifying first-timers during the riders' meeting, but also make a note of who those people are. I spent 2 sessions clueless.
is this NESBA or the CRs' fault? no - not in the least. I saw the CRs working with MANY riders who were anxious to improve (and probably approached the CRs first thing in the morning) but in retrospect, I may have been hindering their day because i was less inclined to ask for guidance.
I do remember the CRs paying close attention to the "intro" group riders, which I think is great. And maybe that's where I found the 'gap' in instruction (between the intro group, and the B riders who are more experienced, and asked for instruction).
in any case, I have no criticism of how anything was handled - merely a suggestion to keep a closer eye on the first-timers. Will all of them be as terrible as I was? god I hope not! But I'm happy to run 2 sessions slow-ish if it makes the new folks more comfortable, and keeps us all safer.
I've never had more fun than I do with NESBA - this includes events with 2 other trackday orgs. keep up the good work.
My first trackday was with NESBA, and I had a blast - but my street riding skills were NOT as good as I had thought they were. to be blunt, I was probably putting other riders at risk my first time out. I hope I'm being constructive by admitting that... i certainly try to remember that every morning in B group going forward.
So if I have any 'feedback,' it would be to continue identifying first-timers during the riders' meeting, but also make a note of who those people are. I spent 2 sessions clueless.
is this NESBA or the CRs' fault? no - not in the least. I saw the CRs working with MANY riders who were anxious to improve (and probably approached the CRs first thing in the morning) but in retrospect, I may have been hindering their day because i was less inclined to ask for guidance.
I do remember the CRs paying close attention to the "intro" group riders, which I think is great. And maybe that's where I found the 'gap' in instruction (between the intro group, and the B riders who are more experienced, and asked for instruction).
in any case, I have no criticism of how anything was handled - merely a suggestion to keep a closer eye on the first-timers. Will all of them be as terrible as I was? god I hope not! But I'm happy to run 2 sessions slow-ish if it makes the new folks more comfortable, and keeps us all safer.
I've never had more fun than I do with NESBA - this includes events with 2 other trackday orgs. keep up the good work.