Matt H;240565 wrote: I agree wtih Andrew on this one (but you are the only one who knows exactly what you are looking for from this endeavor). But to be demonstrative of his point: put a MotoGP bike and 40 year old cafe racer on a frozen lake course. Regardless of which bike is more capable, the only thing being shown is the limit of traction - and since that is way below the capabilities of either bike, the difference in capabilities of the bikes becomes irrelevant. Sort of the weakest link in the chain makes the difference in the overall chain regardless of other capable links.
I'd say go with race tires to show what the design and manufacturing of a stock bike is truly capable of (and not what the design and manufacturing of a tire is capable of). But again, you know what you are after.
"More interested in what the bike can do with the least investment" - minimum investment in suspension and/or race tires.
Is the available grip with the new tech in street/track tires enough? Maybe, maybe not. The first is to find where we are now, versus taking it out there out there with aftermarket wares. Then, find the weaknesses. Is it the shock spring that makes the tire spin first? If so, change that, then ride. Go until another issue.
I would assume tires are the next or very close to next step. If so, change them. Log all of this and provide the feedback to the folks here.
This is what I am curious about
. Nothing prevents us from "walking the tree" - Spring change, front tire, rear tire, forks, rear shock, mapping, etc.... meanwhile logging the diffs and seeing if worth the changes.
If this has been done on a modern sportbike with "Trackday guys" then.... this could be a waste of time.
Again, I agree with Drew's point on tires. But I'd like to get it to spin on the ice first. no assumptions, demonstrate even if it appears obvious.