And then when someone (me) questions the safety of the turn, points out that even by your own admission additional safety measures are required to ensure it "could never happen", you accuse me of whining? That seems like an obvious case of the pot calling the kettle black. It was your post that opened the door to the question. It's a legitimate safety concern that is going to follow this track until something is done that will ensure it "could never happen." Until that time comes, or God forbid the worst happens, you might as well get used to it.I understand there's a concern about bikes going over the guardrail onto the front straight, but the reality is that it's highly unlikely. TPM is in discussion with track management about more safety measures to ensure this could never happen, not even on the worst day ever, but it's a TRACKDAY, not a RACE. I would hope that everybody participating after attending the rider's meeting would be conscious of the risk.
If it's safe then why the extra precaution and the harsh penalty? Bottom line, even the freakish happens. I've been at events when people died from the never-before-happened. (RIP) How bad does it have to get at NCCAR/BIKE before the proper measures are used to prevent even the most unlikely events? Brakes fail, throttles stick, oil and coolant get leaked. Shit happens. The concern about turn 5 and the straight, despite the odds of a bad event or not, is there because the consequences of an airborne bike or person reaching the front straight are far beyond anything I could imagine at any other track. If your rebuttal had more evidence and detail, I would give it more reverence but it sounds more like cheerleading for the company that employs you and doesn't do much to curtail my concerns. I do understand your point about trying it before knocking but the catch to that is that one has to potentially put themselves in harms way to try it out. It didn't take a single lap for guys like Matt Mladin and others to assess the potential hazards at Kansas a few years ago and refuse to race there, so your logic comes up a tad short. I sincerely hope I'm way off the mark and that it is a totally awesome and safe track that will only get better. I plan on visiting and then maybe riding there if I feel good about it. Fred's comments already did a lot to curtail a lot of concerns but I, as anyone should, will reserve final judgement before I slap down my dollars and put myself at risk in what is already a potentially lethal sport.cbr_600rr_freak;235576 wrote: We are going to declare a NO PASSING area from the T4-T5 transition around to the T5 apex marker. Riders breaking that rule once will sit out a session, twice will be asked to leave. We do not want any incidents. And who wants the dubious honor of being the first person to crash a motorcycle at NCCAR?
cbr_600rr_freak;236079 wrote: There are no restrictions on passing in that corner. There are no restrictions on passing in any part of the track. T5 is my favorite corner to pass actually. Sounds like you have false info. Please check facts next time or ask. Wasn't referring to just you about winning John. Guess that just came across wrong. I wont put a track down till i ride it or at least go and view it or walk it. Talk to your assistant SE director. He was grinning from ear to ear after he rode it that Saturday! He will be back! His own words! There is not a way to reach speeds in T5 to cross the track. It would be the freakish of all freakish wrecks. Is that the turn your talking about? It was the first td event ever at the track. Any possible concerns they are fixing. It's a diamond in the rough. It is shining little bit now but will bling bling very soon! Come ride it John. I can get you in for $150 on the friends list. No membership needed.
CCS# 108
TPM Coach
That is the best you have in response?
Dude, everything at its core that I interpret him saying is he is looking out for our saftey, I for one appreciate that cause I don't have a clue.cbr_600rr_freak;236176 wrote: So you are saying TPM is running TD's on a track that is unsafe to riders? Is that correct JRA?
CCS# 108
TPM Coach
What are you, fox news? Don't you see how this comes off as a bit sleezy?cbr_600rr_freak;235989 wrote: So you are saying TPM is running TD's on a track that is unsafe to riders? Is that correct JRA?
CCS# 108
TPM Coach