Carlos Escobar
New Member
Nope.
:agree: with aboveCarlos Escobar;106905 wrote: Nope.
I like the idea of making everyones first track day more welcoming and less intimidating regardless of gender but would like to see us do someting special to encourage more women to ride with us. Just a single guys selfish intersts I suppose. :dunno:HondaGalToo;106883 wrote: The family discount, for members at the same address, applied to membership fees only isn't a bad idea.
Eh, I've done women's only trackdays. When I was first starting out, it was a bit more appealing, but only because I had a preconceived notion that guys would naturally all be more aggressive, and a women's only day would be more "nurturing" (for lack of a better word) to new women riders. I've since learned that lots of guys are just as nervous and timid the first time out, and that women's trackdays weren't as friendly as I might have thought. I have no interest in a women only trackday. No interest in a women's only/2-up session after lunch that another org does, either, as I feel it cuts into everyone's track time.
I've been doing this a long time, and hindsight is that I'd have been just as comfortable had my first day been co-ed.
Do the other orgs have a lot more women members than NESBA? I see there are now two orgs with a cheaper trackday rate for women. That still doesn't make me want to leave NESBA. And, as far as doing things to recruit more women, as someone pointed out, it's such a small demographic that it wouldn't make a blip in the overall number of members. Most other women riders I know are on cruisers.
Ok, that was funny. But trust me, no one needs to see me in a bikini. ROTFLMAO!!!chaun;106946 wrote: Only if there is a bikini bike wash afterwards...
This is good information to have. Since I am new to this sport I have been thinking about women's only days for the reasons you have listed above. It is interesting that you didn't feel that it made a difference.HondaGalToo;106883 wrote:
Eh, I've done women's only trackdays. When I was first starting out, it was a bit more appealing, but only because I had a preconceived notion that guys would naturally all be more aggressive, and a women's only day would be more "nurturing" (for lack of a better word) to new women riders. I've since learned that lots of guys are just as nervous and timid the first time out, and that women's trackdays weren't as friendly as I might have thought. I have no interest in a women only trackday.
rk97;107001 wrote: I think all this "equality" talk is clouding the point. Equality is a myth. As Hank pointed out, there are some people who can easily afford to ride 20 trackdays a year (and do so in style) and others who are happy to afford 1 set of tires and 4-8 days a summer in their tent. When it comes to pricing, everyone is coming to the table un-equal from the start.
Trackdays cost what they cost. Either that price is fair, or it isn't. "equal" and "fair" don't mean the same thing. If the 'regular price' for track X is $180/day, and women (or military, etc.) get a discount, that doesn't make the regular price any less fair.
The fact is that any discount is only a benefit to the person receiving it, whether they 'deserve' it or not. Now if there's some data that suggests discounts would increase overall membership, and thus help NESBA's bottom line, then there's a compelling reason to offer them. I don't quite agree that my "ladies' night" example was "apples and turnips," but I concede that the purpose behind a 'ladies night' in that scenario is to draw in more male customers.
like someone else asked, what is NESBA's goal?
Agreed. The post about a senior citizen discount, although it was in jest (I think ) got me thinking along those exact lines. Seniors get a discount at places because, generally, they're on a fixed income. It could be argued that women get paid less than men (ok, it's better now than in the 70s, but still) and therefore "deserve" a discount. You could make that argument for any number of groups. I think NESBA's pricing is fair, and everyone should pay the same price per day.rk97;107001 wrote: I think all this "equality" talk is clouding the point. Equality is a myth. As Hank pointed out, there are some people who can easily afford to ride 20 trackdays a year (and do so in style) and others who are happy to afford 1 set of tires and 4-8 days a summer in their tent. When it comes to pricing, everyone is coming to the table un-equal from the start.
Trackdays cost what they cost. Either that price is fair, or it isn't. "equal" and "fair" don't mean the same thing. If the 'regular price' for track X is $180/day, and women (or military, etc.) get a discount, that doesn't make the regular price any less fair.
Hell ya! Hook me up with that discount!betarace;106782 wrote: only if that lady is Bubba_Zanetti
Only if you ride in high heels!!!Bubba Zanetti;107010 wrote: Hell ya! Hook me up with that discount!
BZ
You help me get through tech and it's a deal!HondaGalToo;107011 wrote: Only if you ride in high heels!!!
So, you would have no problem with everyone paying the discounted rate and only you paying the "fair" rate? And if that is the case, how big of a discount is still fair? 10%, 37%, 100%....is this fair discount equation something that can be written down and referenced or is it just some arbitrary amount, like 53.75%?rk97;107001 wrote: Trackdays cost what they cost. Either that price is fair, or it isn't. "equal" and "fair" don't mean the same thing. If the 'regular price' for track X is $180/day, and women (or military, etc.) get a discount, that doesn't make the regular price any less fair.
hahahaha - if you haven't noticed, it's what I do. I'll try to dial it backslowpoke;107004 wrote:
Sorry RK - i couldnt' resist